🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are considering comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," commented a leading MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after viewing dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are secure and fit for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from various individuals to copy this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from the West, other states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international debate evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.